Protein synthesis after workouts -
The breakdown of muscles sounds negative, but it is a necessary part of building muscle. When muscles are damaged, they will build back larger, so long as you consume enough calories and protein to repair and grow the muscle tissue.
The ratio of MPS to MPB determines whether muscle tissues are built or lost. If MPS outpaces MPB, muscle growth is achieved. If breakdown outpaces synthesis, then the result can be muscle loss.
MPS can be enhanced by increasing your protein intake immediately following exercise. The amino acids from protein will then be shuttled to your muscles, replacing any lost to exercise. Learning how to stimulate MPS through exercise and diet can help accelerate muscle growth, improve recovery and athletic performance, and increase overall endurance.
Protein balance describes the relationship between muscle protein breakdown and muscle protein synthesis. When your body is in protein balance, no muscle growth or wasting occurs, and you're considered in a healthy state of biological equilibrium homeostasis , otherwise known as maintenance.
To stimulate muscle growth, you essentially need to unsettle the protein balance. While it may seem counter-intuitive, exercise can break down muscle protein but rarely more than the amount of protein you can synthesize.
In fact, the greater the intensity of a workout, the greater the MPS. Remember that this muscle breakdown stimulates the repair and growth of muscle tissue. Scientists measure intensity by something called the one-repetition maximum 1-RM , meaning the maximum weight you can lift for one repetition.
Even if exercising to failure , low-intensity exercise will do little to increase MPS and, as such, will not increase muscle mass.
The relationship between diet and protein balance is less straightforward. Even with increased protein intake, MPS is triggered for only a finite period of time. This is because the body can only utilize so much of the essential amino acids EAAs it receives; anything more will be broken down and excreted by the liver.
Sports nutritionists recommend about 1. You can obtain enough protein through your diet by focusing on dairy, eggs, lean meats , nuts, and legumes.
It is also wise to consume plenty of whole grains, healthy fats, fruits, and vegetables to help your body perform and repair properly.
For instance, carbohydrates are necessary for muscle building since they stimulate insulin release—a hormone that aids muscle cells in absorbing protein.
To stimulate MPS, it is important to consume the appropriate amount of protein following exercise. Eating too much will not improve muscle growth but may increase the accumulation of potentially harmful byproducts such as urea.
A study from the University of Birmingham looked into MPS response rates in men prescribed 10, 20, or 40 grams of whey protein immediately following resistance training. Researchers noticed the following results:. Consuming 20 grams to 40 grams of whey protein after resistance training also increased phenylalanine, leucine, and threonine concentrations, EAAs associated with lean muscle growth.
Note that whey protein is a fast-digesting protein. Further results can likely be obtained by consuming slower digesting protein throughout the day.
Muscle protein synthesis is not something achieved by taking a sports supplement. It is a biological process that can vary by the individual's fitness status. As such, it is not something you can readily measure or manipulate.
With that being said, you can use strategies to promote MPS. Start by increasing the intensity of your workout, pushing weights that require significant force but not enough to undermine proper form or personal safety.
Follow up by feeding your muscles with protein. A gram dose of a digestible protein drink is likely a good place to start. If you consider consuming protein beyond the recommended dietary intake, speak with your doctor or a registered sports nutritionist to understand the potential benefits and risks.
Allow to cool before enjoying! Skip to main content 5 Facts About Protein and Post Workout Recovery By Stephanie Howe, PhD and sports nutritionist. Recovery Recommendations:.
CLIF BUILDERS Chocolate Protein Bar See Details. Quick Shop. CLIF BUILDERS Chocolate Mint Protein Bar See Details. CLIF BUILDERS Chocolate Peanut Butter Flavor Protein Bar Minis See Details. CLIF BUILDERS Chocolate Mint Protein Bar Minis See Details. How does protein repair and rebuild muscle?
How much protein is needed for workout recovery? Why is it important to have protein right after a workout? What type of protein is best after a workout? What foods can help repair and rebuild muscle? References Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: Nutrition and Athletic Performance.
J Acad Nutr Diet. Blom PC, Hostmark AT, Vaage O, Kardel KR, Maehlum S. Effect of different post-exercise sugar diets on the rate of muscle glycogen synthesis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Kerksick CM, Arent S, Schoenfeld BJ, et al. International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutrient timing.
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. Published Aug Fructose coingestion does not accelerate postexercise muscle glycogen repletion. An FSR of 0. This translates to a completely new muscle every 3 months.
However, protein ingestion would disturb this steady state, as a lot of normal amino acids will enter the blood, thus throwing off the tracer amino acid to normal amino acid ratio.
However, our lab has gotten fancy in this area. We have been able to produce highly enriched intrinsically labeled protein. This means that the amino acid tracers have been build into our protein supplements. So as our intrinsically protein supplements are absorbed, both amino acid tracers and normal amino acids enter the blood.
Therefore the steady state is not disrupted and FSR can be calculated more accurately. Example paper FSR with and without intrinsically labeled protein : Holwerda, You can trace the amino acids from the protein: first, as they are digested, then as they appear in the blood, subsequently they are taken up by the muscle, and ultimately some of them are built into actual muscle tissue.
So we can measure how much of the protein you eat, actually ends up into muscle tissue. This is called de novo muscle protein synthesis. Example paper de novo muscle protein synthesis: Trommelen, When measuring muscle protein synthesis, we can measure mixed muscle protein synthesis all types of muscle protein together.
But muscle protein can be further specified into fractions. The main muscle protein fraction is myofibrillar protein. Myofibrillar proteins contract and represent the majority of the muscle mass. This fraction is highly relevant for building muscle mass and strength.
Mitochondrial proteins only represent a small part of the muscle. Mitochondria are the powerhouses of the muscle, they burn carbohydrate and fat for fuel. Therefore mitochondrial protein synthesis is more informative about energy production capacity in the muscle and more relevant for endurance athletes and metabolic health.
Sarcoplasmic protein contains various organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum and ribosomes. Intramuscular connective tissue protein represents collagen protein in the muscle. This collagen helps transfer the muscle force generated by myofibrillar protein. Example paper myofibrillar vs mitochondrial protein synthesis: Wilkinson, , or intramuscular connective tissue protein synthesis Trommelen, More recently, deuterium oxide D2O, also called heavy water is getting popular to measure muscle protein synthesis.
Example paper deuterium oxide: Brooks, There is evidence that a variety of signaling molecules are involved in the regulation of muscle protein synthesis.
Most notably, the protein from the mTOR pathway. Research of these molecular markers is very important to better understand how physiological processes are regulated and ultimately can be influenced by exercise, nutrition or even drugs. Therefore, you should be very skeptical to draw conclusions based on studies that only measure molecular markers of muscle protein synthesis and muscle protein breakdown.
Methods are not necessarily good or bad. But the interpretation of the data based on these methods can be wrong. We recently showed that resistance exercise does not increase whole-body protein synthesis Holwerda, So should we conclude that resistance exercise is not effective to build muscle?
Whole-body protein metabolism measures the synthesis of all proteins in the body. Other tissues in the body have much higher synthesis rates, and therefore, the muscle only has a relatively small contribution to the total whole-body protein synthesis rates.
In the same study, we also measured muscle protein synthesis using the FSR method both with and without intrinsically labeled protein and de novo muscle protein synthesis.
All 3 methods showed that resistance exercise was anabolic for the muscle. Imagine we would have only measured whole-body protein synthesis. Our study would give the wrong impression that resistance exercise is not anabolic, as we saw no increase in whole-body protein synthesis rates.
Shortly, it says that very large protein meals are beneficial because they reduce protein breakdown. Again, this study gave the wrong impression, because whole-body protein breakdown was mistaken for muscle protein breakdown the latter was not measured in this study. Both the 40 gram and the 70 gram dose were equally effective at stimulating muscle protein synthesis.
One of the purposes of measuring muscle protein synthesis is to study if an intervention helps to build muscle or maintain muscle mass. Let me first get something out of the way: we have no bias for either acute or long-term studies.
We run both at our lab, and do some of the most expensive studies in the field of either type. A lot of people seem to think that based on this study, muscle protein synthesis measurements do not translate to actual muscle mass gains in the long term. But that conclusion is way beyond the context of the study.
This study measured muscle protein synthesis in the 6 hours after a single exercise bout. However, resistance exercise can increase muscle protein synthesis for several days. So a 6-hour measurement does not capture the entire exercise response. This study showed that measuring muscle protein synthesis for 6 hours does not predict muscle mass gains.
That is totally different from the conclusion that muscle protein synthesis regardless of measurement time does not predict muscle mass gains. This was followed up by a study which used the deuterium oxide method to measure muscle protein synthesis rates during all the weeks of training not just a few hours after one session , and found that muscle protein synthesis did correlate with muscle mass gains during the training program Brooks, More recently, a study found that muscle protein synthesis measured over 48 hours after an exercise bout did not correlate with muscle mass gains in untrained subjects at the beginning of an exercise training program, but it did at three weeks of training and onwards Damas, While untrained subjects have a large increase in muscle protein synthesis after their initial exercise sessions, they also have a lot of muscle damage.
So muscle protein synthesis is mainly used to repair damaged muscle protein, not to grow. After just 3 weeks of training, muscle damage is diminished, and the increase in muscle protein synthesis is actually used to hypertrophy muscles.
So do these studies show that muscle protein synthesis predicts muscle mass gains, but only in the right context. A huge benefit of muscle protein synthesis studies is that they are more sensitive than studies that measure actual muscle mass gains. This means that muscle protein synthesis studies can detect an anabolic effect easier than long term studies which simply miss it long term studies might draw the wrong conclusion that something does not benefit muscle growth when it actually does.
For example, it has been shown time and time again that protein ingestion increases muscle protein synthesis. Muscle mass gain is simply a very slow process.
You need to do a huge study, with a huge amount of subjects, who consume additional protein for many months, before you will actually see a measurable effect of protein supplementation. We performed a meta-analysis combining the results of individual studies on the effect of protein supplementation on muscle mass gains.
We demonstrated that only 5 studies concluded that protein supplementation had a benefit, while 17 did not! However, most of the studies that showed no significant benefit, did show a small non-significant benefit.
When you combine all those results, you increase the statistical power and you can conclude that protein supplementation actually does improve muscle mass. So in this case, most long-term studies gave the wrong impression, and muscle protein synthesis studies are actually preferred.
There are a lot of long-term studies that have a relative small number of subjects and a small study duration and conclude that an intervention did not work for example, protein supplementation, or X versus Y set of exercise for example.
However, the studies were doomed to begin with. They needed to be 3 times as big and 2 times as long to have a chance to find a positive effect. Now if the effect of giving additional protein is already extremely hard to detect in long-term studies, how realistic is it to find smaller effects?
For example, optimizing protein intake distribution throughout the day has been shown to optimize muscle protein synthesis rates Mamerow, Areta, However, this effect is smaller than adding another protein meal. So the effect of protein distribution is almost impossible to find in a long-term study.
For such a research question, acute muscle protein synthesis studies are simply much better suited. The second big benefit of muscle protein synthesis studies is that they give a lot more mechanistic insight.
They help you understand WHY a certain protein is good or not that good at stimulating muscle protein synthesis for example, its digestion properties, amino acid composition etc.
These kinds of insights help to better understand what triggers muscle growth and come up with new research questions. These kind of insights are very hard to obtain in long-term studies, which typically only show the end result of the mechanisms.
The benefits of measuring muscle protein synthesis include the sensitivity, controlled environment, and they allow you to investigate questions that are almost impossible to answer in long-term studies. Again, we do both and each has its purpose and build on each other.
Usually, muscle protein synthesis studies are performed to see if something work as they are very sensitive and why it works. Only when you have both, you have pretty convincing evidence that your intervention does what you claim it to do.
Multiple sets increase muscle protein synthesis more than a single set Burd, A higher weekly training volume number of sets to muscle results in a greater muscle mass gains Schoenfeld, It is often recommended that a rep range of reps per set is optimal for muscle growth.
The American College of Sport Medicine position stand states ACSM, :. For novice untrained individuals with no RT experience or who have not trained for several years training, it is recommended that loads correspond to a repetition range of an repetition maximum RM. For intermediate individuals with approximately 6 months of consistent RT experience to advanced individuals with years of RT experience training, it is recommended that individuals use a wider loading range from 1 to 12 RM in a periodized fashion with eventual emphasis on heavy loading RM using 3- to 5-min rest periods between sets.
However, these recommendations lack evidence. The main takeaway here is that there are no magic rep ranges that are superior for muscle growth.
It is unclear whether each set should be taken to failure. Muscular failure decreases performance on subsequent sets, thereby reducing training volume. Perhaps performing a set with reps left in the tank will still give a near-maximal stimulus to the muscle, without much of the associated fatigue.
If sets are not taken close to failure, the muscle protein synthetic response will be small Burd, But at least in untrained subjects, training close to failure appears to produce similar muscle mass gains as training to complete failure Nóbrega, A longer rest period between sets increases the larger post-exercise muscle protein synthetic response compared to a short rest period 5 vs 1 min McKendry, In agreement, a longer interset rest period improves muscle mass gains compared to a shorter rest period 3 vs 1 min Schoenfeld, A single bout of resistance exercise can stimulate muscle protein synthesis for longer than 72 hour, but peaks at 24 h Miller, Indeed, training each muscle group at least twice a week results in larger muscle mass gains Schoenfeld, The total muscle protein synthetic MPS response determined by the increase in MPS rates and the duration of these increased rates is decreased in trained subjects compared to untrained subjects Damas, However, the pattern of this decreased response is differs between mixed muscle protein synthesis the synthesis of all types of muscle proteins and myofibrillar protein synthesis the synthesis of contractile proteins: the relevant measurement for muscle mass.
The increase in mixed muscle protein synthesis is shorter lived in trained subjects. In contrast, myofibrillar protein synthesis rates do not increase as much in trained subjects, but the duration of the increase does not appear impacted.
The larger increase in the total muscle protein synthetic response seems like a logical explanation why untrained people can make faster much gains than experienced lifters. However, this is not necessarily true. In untrained subjects, there is not only a large increase myofibrillar protein synthesis, but also in muscle damage following resistance exercise.
A large portion of the myofibrillar protein synthesis is used to simply repair damaged muscle proteins, rather than growing muscle proteins. In more trained subjects, here is a smaller increase in myofibrillar protein synthesis, but there is also much less or even minimal muscle damage following resistance exercise just weeks of training is enough to see these effects.
This means that in a trained state, the increase in myofibrillar protein synthesis can actually be used to actually increase muscle mass.
When you correct for muscle damage, myofibrillar protein synthesis rates measured over 48 hour post-exercise recovery are similair in untrained subjects and after 10 weeks of training Damas, Of course, most athletes would hardly consider someone trained after just 10 weeks. Unfortunately, little is know about how years of serious training impacts the muscle protein synthetic response to resistance exercise.
Twenty gram of protein gives a near-maximal increase in MPS after lower body resistance. When data of several studies was combined and the amount of protein was expressed per bodyweight, it was found that on average 0.
However, the authors suggest a safety margin of 2 standard deviations to account for inter-intervidual variability, resulting in a dose of protein that would optimally stimulate MPS at an intake of 0.
More recently, it has been shown that the amount of lean body mass does not impact the response to protein ingestion Macnaughton, The authors speculated that this was related to the fact that this was following a session of whole-body resistance exercise compared to the lower-body exercise used in previous studies.
Protein sources differ in their capacity to stimulate MPS. This is best illustrated by study which compared the muscle protein synthetic response to casein, casein hydrolysate and whey protein. Casein is a slowly digesting protein. When intact casein is hydrolyzed chemically cut into smaller pieces , it resembles the digestion of a fast-digesting protein.
Consequently, hydrolyzed casein results in higher MPS rates than intact casein. However, the muscle protein synthetic response to hydrolyzed is lower than that of whey protein.
While both proteins are fast digesting, whey protein has a higher essential amino acid content including leucine Pennings, Animal based protein sources are typically have a high essential amino acid content and appears more potent than plant protein to stimulate MPS Van Vliet, However, there this can potentially compensated by ingesting a greater amount of plant protein Gorissen, Leucine is the amino acid that is thought to be most potent at stimulating MPS.
Peak plasma leucine concentrations following protein ingestion typically correlate with muscle protein synthesis rates Pennings, This supports the notion that protein digestion rate and protein leucine content are important predictors for anabolic effect of a protein source.
This is best illustrated by study Churchward-Venne, which compared the muscle protein synthetic response to five different supplemental protocol:. All five conditions increased muscle protein synthesis rates compared to fasting conditions.
As expected from our earlier discussion on the optimal amount of protein, 25 gram of protein increased MPS rates more than just 6. Interestingly, the addition of 2.
The addition of a larger amount of leucine 4. This indicates that the addition of a relatively small amount of leucine to a low dose of protein can be as effective as a much larger total amount of protein.
Isoleucine and valine use the same transporter for uptake in the gut as leucine. Therefore, it is speculated that isoleucine and valine compete for uptake with leucine, resulting in a less rapid leucine peak which is thought to be an important determinant of MPS rates.
Carbohydrates slows down protein digestion, but have no effect on MPS Gorissen, In agreement, adding large amounts of carbohydrates to protein does not improve post-exercise MPS rates Koopman, However, the addition of carbohydrates to post-exercise protein has no effect on muscle protein synthesis or breakdown rates.
The effects of insulin on muscle protein breakdown rates are described in more detail in section 2, and the effects of insulin on muscle protein synthesis are further described in section 7.
Adding oil to protein does not slow down protein digestion or MPS Gorissen, It possible that oil simply floats on top of a protein shake in the stomach, and that a solid fat would delay digestion. One study has reported a greater increase in net muscle balance following full-fat milk compared to fat-free milk although this study used the 2 pool arterio-venous model which is not the most reliable measurement.
Muscle Tart cherry juice for skin health synthesis is essential for exercise recovery and adaptation. Protein synthesis after workouts the methods used to adter muscle protein synthesis in studies are Protein synthesis after workouts complicated. The HbAc goals of this wynthesis is aftef provide a comprehensive guide on muscle protein synthesis: what is it, how is it measured, what are the strengths and limitations, how to draw proper conclusions from muscle protein synthesis research, and of course practical guidelines how to optimize it. Please note that section 3 described the various methods to measure muscle protein synthesis. You might want to skip this section if you just want exercise and nutrition guidelines to optimize gains. Maximizing the post-exercise syhthesis in muscle protein synthesis, Wrokouts of the contractile synhhesis protein fraction, Menstrual health and nutrition essential to facilitate aftdr muscle remodeling, and enhance hypertrophic gains Protein synthesis after workouts resistance training. Sfter is the primary regulated variable influencing muscle net balance with dietary amino acid ingestion representing the single most important nutritional variable enhancing post-exercise rates of muscle protein synthesis. Dose-response studies in average i. Re-analysis of published literature in young adults suggests a relative single meal intake of ~0. This muscle-specific bolus intake is lower than that reported to maximize whole body anabolism i.
0 thoughts on “Protein synthesis after workouts”