Evidence-based weight approaches -
These are more strongly linked to health outcomes than is weight. Additionally, when fruits and vegetables are juiced, components such as fiber are lost, but the simple sugars remain.
Drinking the equivalent of five fruits is not the same as eating those five fruits. Drinking calories for weight loss can be problematic because it eliminates the chewing process, making overconsumption easier. Drinking calories does not provide the same satiety as eating whole food calories.
Fasting is required for weight loss A newer trend in weight loss is fasting or intermittent fasting. The former has long been disproven as a way for successful weight loss because most individuals return to the eating habits that caused the weight gain to begin with.
These factors can greatly influence success beyond simple diet strategies. There are no magical fat-burning foods No one food significantly increases metabolism or triggers fat burning.
It is difficult to lose weight successfully, so the appeal of magic foods, from coconut oil to superfruit, is strong. Your email address will not be published. For over 20 years, OR Today has provided perioperative and SPD professionals with up-to-date news and information about their profession.
The magazine aims to educate readers about new guidelines, techniques, and equipment, as well as practical information for career building, problem-solving and overall well-being.
Digital Issues. In the US, and US Read More. Powered by ambient sensor technology and artificial intelligence, Apella provides new data and insights Patient Monitor Software Helps Drive Quieter Alarm Management Strategies Advances in healthcare technology continue to drive patient monitoring technology into the future; however, alarm sounds have remained similar, if not unchanged, for many years.
Until now. Royal Philips, has received k clearance for its latest IntelliVue patient Edith Dee Hall Remembering Nursing Pioneer, AORN Founder. Follow Follow Follow Follow. Features Cover Story Company Showcase Spotlight On Industry Insights News and Notes AAMI ACHC ASCA CCI HSPA TJC NIFA In The OR Market Analysis Product Showroom Out of The OR EQ Factor Health Fitness Nutrition Recipe Contest Webinars Upcoming Webinars Past Webinars News Resources White Papers Buyers Guide Conferences Georgia Council Periop ConneCT Subscribe Digital Issues Digital Supplements Monthly Magazines.
Evidence-Based Approaches for Weight Loss by OR Today Magazine Feb 1, Nutrition , Out of The OR. By Matt Ruscigno, P.
Share Tweet LinkedIn. Search Search for:. Sign up for our newsletter Name First. Subscribe Me. This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. In other words, obesity may be an early symptom of diabetes as opposed to its primary underlying cause.
Hypertension provides another example of a condition highly associated with weight; research suggests that it is two to three times more common among obese people than lean people [ 79 ]. To what extent hypertension is caused by adiposity, however, is unclear.
That BMI correlates more strongly with blood pressure than percent body fat [ 80 ] indicates that the association between BMI and blood pressure results from higher lean mass as opposed to fat mass. Also, the association may have more to do with the weight cycling that results from trying to control weight than the actual weight itself [ 48 , 81 , 82 ].
One study conducted with obese individuals determined that weight cycling was strongly positively associated with incident hypertension [ 82 ]. Another study showed that obese women who had dieted had high blood pressure, while those who had never been on a diet had normal blood pressure [ 67 ].
Rat studies also show that obese rats that have weight cycled have very high blood pressures compared to obese rats that have not weight cycled [ 83 , 84 ].
This finding could also explain the weak association between obesity and hypertension in cultures where dieting is uncommon[ 48 , 85 ]. Additionally, it is well documented that obese people with hypertension live significantly longer than thinner people with hypertension [ 43 , 86 — 88 ] and have a lower risk of heart attack, stroke, or early death [ 45 ].
Rather than identifying health risk, as it does in thinner people, hypertension in heavier people may simply be a requirement for pumping blood through their larger bodies [ 89 ].
It is also notable that the prevalence of hypertension dropped by half between and , a time when average weight sharply increased, declining much more steeply among those deemed overweight and obese than among thinner individuals [ 90 ].
Incidence of cardiovascular disease also plummeted during this time period and many common diseases now emerge at older ages and are less severe [ 90 ].
The notable exception is diabetes, which showed a small, non-significant increase during this time period [ 90 ].
While the decreased morbidity can at least in part be attributed to improvements in medical care, the point remains that we are simply not seeing the catastrophic disease consequences predicted to result from the "obesity epidemic.
Evidence: Most prospective observational studies suggest that weight loss increases the risk of premature death among obese individuals, even when the weight loss is intentional and the studies are well controlled with regard to known confounding factors, including hazardous behavior and underlying diseases [ 91 — 96 ].
Recent review of NHANES, for example, a nationally representative sample of ethnically diverse people over the age of fifty, shows that mortality increased among those who lost weight [ 97 ]. While many short-term weight loss intervention studies do indicate improvements in health measures, because the weight loss is always accompanied by a change in behavior, it is not known whether or to what extent the improvements can be attributed to the weight loss itself.
Liposuction studies that control for behavior change provide additional information about the effects of weight fat loss itself.
One study which explicitly monitored that there were no changes in diet and activity for weeks post abdominal liposuction is a case in point.
Participants lost an average of Note that liposuction removes subcutaneous fat, not the visceral fat that is more highly associated with disease, and these results should be interpreted carefully. In most studies on type 2 diabetes, the improvement in glycemic control is seen within days, before significant weight or fat is lost.
Evidence also challenges the assumption that weight loss is associated with improvement in long-term glycemic control, as reflected in HbA1c values [ 99 , ].
One review of controlled weight-loss studies for people with type 2 diabetes showed that initial improvements were followed by a deterioration back to starting values six to eighteen months after treatment, even when the weight loss was maintained [ ].
Furthermore, health benefits associated with weight loss rarely show a dose response in other words, people who lose small amounts of weight generally get as much health benefit from the intervention as those who lose larger amounts. These data suggest that the behavior change as opposed to the weight loss itself may play a greater role in health improvement.
Evidence: Long-term follow-up studies document that the majority of individuals regain virtually all of the weight that was lost during treatment, regardless of whether they maintain their diet or exercise program [ 5 , 27 ]. Consider the Women's Health Initiative, the largest and longest randomized, controlled dietary intervention clinical trial, designed to test the current recommendations.
More than 20, women maintained a low-fat diet, reportedly reducing their calorie intake by an average of calories per day [ ] and significantly increasing their activity [ ]. After almost eight years on this diet, there was almost no change in weight from starting point a loss of 0.
A panel of experts convened by the National Institutes of Health determined that "one third to two thirds of the weight is regained within one year [after weight loss], and almost all is regained within five years. There is a paucity of long term data regarding surgical studies, but emerging data indicates gradual post-surgery weight regain as well [ , ].
Weight loss peaks about one year postoperative, after which gradual weight regain is the norm. Evidence: As discussed earlier, weight cycling is the most common result of engaging in conventional dieting practices and is known to increase morbidity and mortality risk.
Research identifies many other contraindications to the pursuit of weight loss. For example, dieting is known to reduce bone mass, increasing risk for osteoporosis [ — ]; this is true even in an obese population, though obesity is typically associated with reduced risk for osteoporosis[ ].
Research also suggests that dieting is associated with increased chronic psychological stress and cortisol production, two factors known to increase disease risk [ ]. Also, there is emerging evidence that persistent organic pollutants POPs , which bioaccumulate in adipose tissue and are released during its breakdown, can increase risk of various chronic diseases including type 2 diabetes [ , ], cardiovascular disease [ ] and rheumatoid arthritis [ ]; two studies document that people who have lost weight have higher concentration of POPs in their blood [ , ].
One review of the diabetes literature indicates "that obese persons that sic do not have elevated POPs are not at elevated risk of diabetes, suggesting that the POPs rather than the obesity per se is responsible for the association" [ ].
Positing the value of weight loss also supports widespread anxiety about weight [ , ]. Evidence from the eating disorder literature indicates an emphasis on weight control can promote eating disordered behaviors [ 7 ]. Prospective studies show that body dissatisfaction is associated with binge eating and other eating disordered behaviors, lower levels of physical activity and increased weight gain over time [ , ].
Many studies also show that dieting is a strong predictor of future weight gain [ 66 , — ]. Another unintended consequence of the weight loss imperative is an increase in stigmatization and discrimination against fat individuals.
Discrimination based on weight now equals or exceeds that based on race or gender [ ]. Extensive research indicates that stigmatizing fat demotivates, rather than encourages, health behavior change [ ].
Adults who face weight stigmatization and discrimination report consuming increased quantities of food [ — ], avoiding exercise [ , — ], and postponing or avoiding medical care for fear of experiencing stigmatization [ ]. Stigmatization and bias on the part of health care practitioners is well-documented, resulting in lower quality care [ , ].
Evidence: That weight loss will improve health over the long-term for obese people is, in fact, an untested hypothesis. One reason the hypothesis is untested is because no methods have proven to reduce weight long-term for a significant number of people. Also, while normal weight people have lower disease incidence than obese individuals, it is unknown if weight loss in individuals already obese reduces disease risk to the same level as that observed in those who were never obese [ 91 , 93 ].
As indicated by research conducted by one of the authors and many other investigators, most health indicators can be improved through changing health behaviors, regardless of whether weight is lost [ 11 ].
For example, lifestyle changes can reduce blood pressure, largely or completely independent of changes in body weight [ 11 , — ].
The same can be said for blood lipids [ 11 , — ]. Improvements in insulin sensitivity and blood lipids as a result of aerobic exercise training have been documented even in individuals who gained body fat during the intervention [ , ].
Although this estimate has been granted credence by health experts, the word "estimate" is important to note: as the authors state, most of the cost changes are not "statistically different from zero. All are independently correlated with both weight and health and could play a role in explaining the costs associated with having a BMI over Nor does it account for costs associated with unintended consequences of positing the value of a weight focus, which may include eating disorders, diet attempts, weight cycling, reduced self-esteem, depression, and discrimination.
Because BMI is considered a risk factor for many diseases, obese persons are automatically relegated to greater testing and treatment, which means that positing BMI as a risk factor results in increased costs, regardless of whether BMI itself is problematic. Yet using BMI as a proxy for health may be more costly than addressing health directly.
Consider, for example, the findings of a study which examined the "healthy obese" and the "unhealthy normal weight" populations [ ].
The study identified six different risk factors for cardiometabolic health and included subjects in the "unhealthy" group if they had two or more risk factors, making it a more stringent threshold of health than that used in categorizing metabolic syndrome or diabetes.
The study found a substantial proportion of the overweight and obese population, at every age, who were healthy and a substantial proportion of the "normal weight" group who were unhealthy. Psychologist Deb Burgard examined the costs of overlooking the normal weight people who need treatment and over-treating the obese people who do not personal communication, March She found that BMI profiling overlooks When the total population is considered, this means that 31 percent of the population is mis-identified when BMI is used as a proxy for health.
The weight bias inherent in BMI profiling may actually result in higher costs and sicker people. As an example, consider a study published in the American Journal of Public Health The authors compared people of similar age, gender, education level, and rates of diabetes and hypertension, and examined how often they reported feeling sick over a day period.
Results indicated that body image had a much bigger impact on health than body size. In other words, two equally fat women would have very different health outcomes, depending on how they felt about their bodies.
Likewise, two women with similar body insecurities would have similar health outcomes, even if one were fat and the other thin. These results suggest that the stigma associated with being fat is a major contributor to obesity-associated disease.
BMI and health are only weakly related in cultures where obesity is not stigmatized, such as in the South Pacific [ 48 , ].
This section explains the rationale supporting some of the significant ways in which the HAES paradigm differs from the conventional weight-focused paradigm. The following topics are addressed:. HAES supports reliance on internal regulatory processes, such as hunger and satiety, as opposed to encouraging cognitively-imposed dietary restriction; and.
Conventional thought suggests that body discontent helps motivate beneficial lifestyle change [ , ]. However, as discussed previously in the section on the pursuit of weight loss, evidence suggests the opposite: promoting body discontent instead induces harm [ , , , ], resulting in less favorable lifestyle choices.
A common aphorism expressed in the HAES community is that "if shame were effective motivation, there wouldn't be many fat people.
Promoting one body size as more favorable than another also has ethical consequences [ ], contributing to shaming and discrimination. Compassion-focused behavior change theory emerging from the eating disorders field suggests that self-acceptance is a cornerstone of self-care, meaning that people with strong self-esteem are more likely to adopt positive health behaviors [ , ].
The theory is borne out in practice: HAES research shows that by learning to value their bodies as they are right now, even when this differs from a desired weight or shape or generates ambivalent feelings, people strengthen their ability to take care of themselves and sustain improvements in health behaviors [ 8 , 11 ].
Critics of HAES express concern that encouraging body acceptance will lead individuals to eat with abandon and disregard dietary considerations, resulting in weight gain.
This has been disproven by the evidence; no randomized controlled HAES study has resulted in weight gain, and all studies that report on dietary quality or eating behavior indicate improvement or at least maintenance [ 11 , 14 — 23 ].
This is in direct contrast to dieting behavior, which is associated with weight gain over time [ 66 , — ]. Conventional recommendations view conscious efforts to monitor and restrict food choices as a necessary aspect of eating for health or weight control [ ].
The underlying belief is that cognitive monitoring is essential for keeping appetite under control and that without these injunctions people would make nutritionally inadvisable choices, including eating to excess. The evidence, however, disputes the value of encouraging external regulation and restraint as a means for weight control: several large scale studies demonstrate that eating restraint is actually associated with weight gain over time [ 66 , — ].
In contrast, HAES teaches people to rely on internal regulation, a process dubbed intuitive eating [ ], which encourages them to increase awareness of their body's response to food and learn how to make food choices that reflect this "body knowledge.
HAES teaches people to make connections between what they eat and how they feel in the short- and medium-term, paying attention to food and mood, concentration, energy levels, fullness, ease of bowel movements, comfort eating, appetite, satiety, hunger and pleasure as guiding principles.
The journey towards adopting intuitive eating is typically a process one engages in over time. Particularly for people with a long history of dieting, other self-imposed dietary restriction, or body image concerns, it can feel very precarious to let go of old habits and attitudes and risk trying new ways of relating to food and self.
Coming to eat intuitively happens gradually as old beliefs about food, nutrition and eating are challenged, unlearned and replaced with new ones. A large popular literature has accumulated that supports individuals in developing intuitive eating skills [ 8 , — ]. Intuitive eating is also known in the literature as "attuned eating" or "mindful eating.
There is considerable evidence that intuitive eating skills can be learned [ 11 , 18 , ], and that intuitive eating is associated with improved nutrient intake [ ], reduced eating disorder symptomatology [ 17 , 18 , — ] - and not with weight gain [ 11 , 13 , 16 — 18 ].
Several studies have found intuitive eating to be associated with lower body mass [ , , , ]. HAES encourages people to build activity into their day-to-day routines and focuses on helping people find enjoyable ways of being active. The goal is to promote well-being and self-care rather than advising individuals to meet set guidelines for frequency and intensity of exercise.
Active living is promoted for a range of physical, psychological and other synergistic benefits which are independent of weight loss. Myths around weight control and exercise are explicitly challenged. Physical activity is also used in HAES as a way of healing a sense of body distrust and alienation from physicality that may be experienced when people are taught to over-ride embodied internal signals in pursuit of externally derived goals, such as commonly occurs in dieting.
In addition, some HAES programs have used physical activity sessions, along with other activities such as art and relaxation, to further a community development agenda, creating volunteer, training and employment opportunities and addressing issues of isolation, poor self-esteem and depression among course participants.
There are serious ethical concerns regarding the continued use of a weight-centered paradigm in current practice in relation to beneficence and nonmaleficence. Beneficence concerns the requirement to effect treatment benefit.
There is a paucity of literature to substantiate that the pursuit of weight control is beneficial, and a similar lack of evidence to support that weight loss is maintained over the long term or that programs aimed at prevention of weight gain are successful.
Nonmaleficence refers to the requirement to do no harm. Much research suggests damage results from a weight-centered focus, such as weight cycling and stigmatization.
Consideration of several dimensions of ethical practice - veracity, fidelity, justice and a compassionate response - suggests that the HAES paradigm shift may be required for professional ethical accountability [ ].
The new public health ethics advocates scrutiny of the values and structure of medical care, recognizing that the remedy to poor health and health inequalities does not lie solely in individual choices.
This ethicality has been adopted by HAES in several ways. HAES academics have highlighted the inherent limitations of an individualistic approach to conceptualizing health.
Individual self-care is taken as a starting point for HAES programs, but, unlike more conventional interventions, the HAES ethos recognizes the structural basis of health inequities and understands empowerment as a process that effects collective change in advancing social justice [ ].
HAES advocates have also stressed the need for action to challenge the thinness privilege and to better enable fat people's voices to be heard in and beyond health care [ 8 , ].
The hallmark theme of the new public health agenda is that it emphasizes the complexity of health determinants and the need to address systemic health inequities in order to improve population-wide health outcomes and reduce health disparities, making use of the evidence on the strong relationship between a person's social positioning and their health.
For example, research since the s has documented huge differences in cardiac health between and across socioeconomic gradients which has come to be recognized as arising from disparities in social standing and is articulated as the status syndrome [ ].
Since weight tracks closely with socioeconomic class, obesity is a particularly potent marker of social disparity [ ]. There is extensive research documenting the role of chronic stress in conditions conventionally described as obesity-associated, such as hypertension, diabetes and coronary heart disease [ ].
These conditions are mediated through increased metabolic risk seen as raised cholesterol, raised blood pressure, raised triglycerides and insulin resistance. The increase in metabolic risk can in part be explained by a change in eating, exercise and drinking patterns attendant on coping with stress.
However, changes in health behaviors do not fully account for the metabolic disturbances. Instead, stress itself alters metabolism independent of a person's lifestyle habits [ ]. Thus, it has been suggested that psychological distress is the antecedent of high metabolic risk [ ], which indicates the need to ensure health promotion policies utilize strategies known to reduce, rather than increase, psychological stress.
In addition to the impact of chronic stress on health, an increasing body of international research, discussed earlier, recognizes particular pathways through which weight stigmatization and discrimination impact on health, health-seeking behaviors, and quality of health care [ — ].
Policies which promote weight loss as feasible and beneficial not only perpetuate misinformation and damaging stereotypes [ ], but also contribute to a healthist, moralizing discourse which mitigates against socially-integrated approaches to health [ , , , ].
While access to size acceptance practitioners can ameliorate the harmful effects of discrimination in health care for individuals, systemic change is required to address the iatrogenic consequences of institutional size discrimination in and beyond health care, discrimination that impacts on people's opportunities and health.
Quite aside from the ethical arguments underscoring inclusive, non-discriminatory health care and civil rights, there are plausible metabolic pathways through which reducing weight stigma, by reducing inequitable social processes, can help alleviate the burden of poor health.
From the perspective of efficacy as well as ethics, body weight is a poor target for public health intervention. There is sufficient evidence to recommend a paradigm shift from conventional weight management to Health at Every Size. More research that considers the unintended consequences of a weight focus can help to clarify the associated costs and will better allow practitioners to challenge the current paradigm.
Continued research that includes larger sample sizes and more diverse populations and examines how best to deliver a Health at Every Size intervention, customized to specific populations, is called for. We propose the following guidelines, which are supported by the Association for Size Diversity and Health ASDAH , to assist professionals in implementing HAES.
Our proposed guidelines are modified, with permission, from guidelines developed by the Academy for Eating Disorders for working with children [ 7 ]. Interventions should meet ethical standards. They should focus on health, not weight, and should be referred to as "health promotion" and not marketed as "obesity prevention.
Interventions should seek to change major determinants of health that reside in inequitable social, economic and environmental factors, including all forms of stigma and oppression.
Interventions should be constructed from a holistic perspective, where consideration is given to physical, emotional, social, occupational, intellectual, spiritual, and ecological aspects of health.
Interventions should promote self-esteem, body satisfaction, and respect for body size diversity. Interventions should accurately convey the limited impact that lifestyle behaviors have on overall health outcomes.
Lifestyle-oriented elements of interventions that focus on physical activity and eating should be delivered from a compassion-centered approach that encourages self-care rather than as prescriptive injunctions to meet expert guidelines.
Interventions should focus only on modifiable behaviors where there is evidence that such modification will improve health. Weight is not a behavior and therefore not an appropriate target for behavior modification.
Lay experience should inform practice, and the political dimensions of health research and policy should be articulated. These guidelines outline ways in which health practitioners can shift their practice towards a HAES approach and, in so doing, uphold the tenets of their profession in providing inclusive, effective, and ethical care consistent with the evidence base.
We accept this argument; we have used "overweight" and "obese" throughout this paper when necessary to report research where these categories were used. We recognize, however, that "normal" does not reflect a normative or optimal value; that "overweight" falsely implies a weight over which one is unhealthy; and that the etymology of the word "obese" mistakenly implies that a large appetite is the cause.
Linda Bacon and Lucy Aphramor are HAES practitioners. Both also speak and write on the topic of Health at Every Size and sometimes receive financial remuneration for this work.
Marketdata Enterprises: The U. Google Scholar. Monteath SA, McCabe MP: The influence of societal factors on female body image.
J Soc Psychol. CAS PubMed Google Scholar. Neumark-Sztainer D, Rock CL, Thornquist MD, Cheskin LJ, Neuhouser ML, Barnett MJ: Weight-control behaviors among adults and adolescents: Associations with dietary intake. Prev Med. Jeffery RW, Adlis SA, Forster JL: Prevalence of dieting among working men and women: The Healthy Worker Project.
Health Psychol. Mann T, Tomiyama AJ, Westling E, Lew AM, Samuels B, Chatman J: Medicare's Search for Effective Obesity Treatments: Diets Are Not the Answer. Am Psychol. PubMed Google Scholar. Neumark-Sztainer D: Preventing obesity and eating disorders in adolescents: what can health care providers do?.
J Adolesc Health. Daníelsdóttir S, Burgard D, Oliver-Pyatt W: AED Guidelines for Childhood Obesity Prevention Programs. Bacon L: Health at Every Size: The Surprising Truth About Your Weight.
Schmidt H, Voigt K, Wikler D: Carrots, Sticks, and Health Care Reform -- Problems with Wellness Incentives. N Engl J Med. Medical News Today: Eating Disorder Organizations Join Forces To Urge Focus On Health And Lifestyle Rather Than Weight. Bacon L, Stern J, Van Loan M, Keim N: Size acceptance and intuitive eating improve health for obese, female chronic dieters.
J Am Diet Assoc. Ciliska D: Evaluation of two nondieting interventions for obese women. West J Nurs Res. Goodrick GK, Poston WSC, Kimball KT, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP: Nondieting versus dieting treatment for overweight binge-eating women. J Consult Clin Psychol. Tanco S, Linden W, Earle T: Well-being and morbid obesity in women: A controlled therapy evaluation.
Int J Eat Disord. Miller WC, Wallace JP, Eggert KE, Lindeman AK: Cardiovascular risk reduction in a self-taught, self-administered weight loss program called the nondiet diet.
Med Exerc Nutr Health. Rapoport L, Clark M, Wardle J: Evaluation of a modified cognitive-behavioural programme for weight management. Int J Obes. CAS Google Scholar. Provencher V, Begin C, Tremblay A, Mongeau L, Corneau L, Dodin S, Boivin S, Lemieux S: Health-at-every-size and eating behaviors: 1-year follow-up results of a size acceptance intervention.
Mensinger J, Close H, Ku J: Intuitive eating: A novel health promotion strategy for obese women. Paper presented at American Public Health Association. Philadelphia, PA.
Bacon L, Keim N, Van Loan M, Derricote M, Gale B, Kazaks A, Stern J: Evaluating a "Non-diet" Wellness Intervention for Improvement of Metabolic Fitness, Psychological Well-Being and Eating and Activity Behaviors.
Provencher V, Bégin C, Tremblay A, Mongeau L, Boivin S, Lemieux S: Short-term effects of a "health-at-every-size" approach on eating behaviors and appetite ratings. Obesity Silver Spring. Steinhardt M, Bezner J, Adams T: Outcomes of a traditional weight control program and a nondiet alternative: a one-year comparison.
J Psychol. Carrier KM, Steinhardt MA, Bowman S: Rethinking traditional weight management programs: A 3-year follow-up evaluation of a new approach.
Omichinski L, Harrison KR: Reduction of dieting attitudes and practices after participation in a non-diet lifestyle program. J Can Diet Assoc.
Polivy J, Herman CP: Undieting: A program to help people stop dieting. Roughan P, Seddon E, Vernon-Roberts J: Long-term effects of a psychologically based group programme for women preoccupied with body weight and eating behaviour. Higgins L, Gray W: Changing the body image concern and eating behaviour of chronic dieters: the effects of a psychoeducational intervention.
Psychol and Health. Miller WC: How effective are traditional dietary and exercise interventions for weight loss?. Med Sci Sports Exerc.
National Institutes of Health NIH : Methods for voluntary weight loss and control Technology Assessment Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. Gregg EW, Gerzoff RB, Thompson TJ, Williamson DF: Intentional weight loss and death in overweight and obese U.
adults 35 years of age and older. Wamala S, Lynch J, Horsten M: Education and the Metabolic Syndrome in Women.
Diabetes Care. Aphramor L: Validity of claims made in weight management research: a narrative review of dietetic articles. Nutr J. PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH: Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity.
Durazo-Arvizu R, McGee D, Cooper R, Liao Y, Luke A: Mortality and optimal body mass index in a sample of the US population.
Am J Epidemiol. Troiano R, Frongillo E, Sobal J, Levitsky D: The relationship between body weight and mortality: A quantitative analysis of combined information from existing studies.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. Flegal K, Graubard B, Williamson D, Gail M: Supplement: Response to "Can Fat Be Fit". Sci Am. McGee DL: Body mass index and mortality: a meta-analysis based on person-level data from twenty-six observational studies. Ann Epidemiol. Janssen I, Mark AE: Elevated body mass index and mortality risk in the elderly.
Obes Rev. Lantz PM, Golberstein E, House JS, Morenoff J: Socioeconomic and behavioral risk factors for mortality in a national year prospective study of U. Soc Sci Med. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Hartge P, Cerhan JR, Flint AJ, Hannan L, MacInnis RJ, Moore SC, Tobias GS, Anton-Culver H, Freeman LB, et al: Body-mass index and mortality among 1.
Childers D, Allison D: The 'obesity paradox': a parsimonious explanation for relations among obesity, mortality rate and aging?. Int J Obes Lond. Morse S, Gulati R, Reisin E: The obesity paradox and cardiovascular disease. Curr Hypertens Rep. Ross C, Langer RD, Barrett-Connor E: Given diabetes, is fat better than thin?.
Barrett-Connor E, Khaw K: Is hypertension more benign when associated with obesity?. Barrett-Connor EL: Obesity, atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. Kang X, Shaw LJ, Hayes SW, Hachamovitch R, Abidov A, Cohen I, Friedman JD, Thomson LE, Polk D, Germano G, Berman DS: Impact of body mass index on cardiac mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease undergoing myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.
J Am Coll Cardiol. Beddhu S: The body mass index paradox and an obesity, inflammation, and atherosclerosis syndrome in chronic kidney disease.
Seminars in Dialysis. Ernsberger P, Haskew P: Health implications of obesity: An alternative view. J of Obesity and Weight Regulation. Ernsberger P, Koletsky RJ: Biomedical rationale for a wellness approach to obesity: An alternative to a focus on weight loss.
J Soc Issues. Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Ventura HO: Obesity, heart disease, and favorable prognosis--truth or paradox?. Am J Med. Gruberg L, Mercado N, Milo S, Boersma E, Disco C, van Es GA, Lemos PA, Ben Tzvi M, Wijns W, Unger F, et al: Impact of body mass index on the outcome of patients with multivessel disease randomized to either coronary artery bypass grafting or stenting in the ARTS trial: The obesity paradox II?.
Am J Cardiol. Lavie CJ, Osman AF, Milani RV, Mehra MR: Body composition and prognosis in chronic systolic heart failure: the obesity paradox.
Schmidt DS, Salahudeen AK: Obesity-survival paradox-still a controversy?. Semin Dial. Kulminski AM, Arbeev KG, Kulminskaya IV, Ukraintseva SV, Land K, Akushevich I, Yashin AI: Body mass index and nine-year mortality in disabled and nondisabled older U.
J Am Geriatr Soc. Olshansky SJ, Passaro DJ, Hershow RC, Layden J, Carnes BA, Brody J, Hayflick L, Butler RN, Allison DB, Ludwig DS: A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century. Belluck P: Children's Life Expectancy Being Cut Short by Obesity.
New York City. Carmona R: Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Competition, Infrastructure, and Foreign Commerce Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
United States Senate. White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity: Solving the Problem of Childhood Obesity Within a Generation. Report to the White House.
National Center for Health Statistics: Health, United States, With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Hyattsville, MD. Mathers C, Loncar D: Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from to PLoS Med. Social Security Administration: Periodic Life Table.
Campos P, Saguy A, Ernsberger P, Oliver E, Gaesser G: The epidemiology of overweight and obesity: public health crisis or moral panic?. Int J Epidemiol. Kruger J, Galuska DA, Serdula MK, Jones DA: Attempting to lose weight: specific practices among U. Am J Prev Med.
Strohacker K, McFarlin B: Influence of obesity, physical inactivity, and weight cycling on chronic inflammation. Front Biosci. Montani JP, Viecelli AK, Prevot A, Dulloo AG: Weight cycling during growth and beyond as a risk factor for later cardiovascular diseases: the 'repeated overshoot' theory.
Olson MB, Kelsey SF, Bittner V, Reis SE, Reichek N, Handberg EM, Merz CN: Weight cycling and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in women: evidence of an adverse effect: a report from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE study. Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study Group.
French SA, Jeffrey RW, Forster JL, McGovern PG, Kelder SH, Baxter J: Predictors of weight change over two years among a population of working adults: The Healthy Worker Project. Guagnano MT, Pace-Palitti V, Carrabs C, Merlitti D, Sensi S: Weight fluctuations could increase blood pressure in android obese women.
Clinical Sciences London. Rzehak P, Meisinger C, Woelke G, Brasche S, Strube G, Heinrich J: Weight change, weight cycling and mortality in the ERFORT Male Cohort Study. Eur J Epidemiol.
Lissner L, Odell PM, D'Agostino RB, Stokes J, Kreger BE, Belanger AJ, Brownell KD: Variability of body weight and health outcomes in the Framingham population. Diaz VA, Mainous AG, Everett CJ: The association between weight fluctuation and mortality: results from a population-based cohort study.
J Community Health. McDermott R: Ethics, Epidemiology, and the Thrifty Gene: Biological Determinism as a Health Hazard. Brunner E, Marmot M: Social Organization, Stress, and Health. Social Determinants of Health. Edited by: Marmot M, Wilkinson RG. Raphael D, Lines E, Bryant T, Daiski I, Pilkington B, Dinca-Panaitescu S, Dinca-Panaitescu M: Type 2 Diabetes: Poverty, Priorities and Policy.
The Social Determinants of the Incidence and Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Charles MA, Pettitt DJ, Saad MF, Nelson RG, Bennett PH, Knowler WC: Development of impaired glucose tolerance with or without weight gain. Odeleye OE, de Courten M, Pettitt DJ, Ravussin E: Fasting hyperinsulinemia is a predictor of increased body weight gain and obesity in Pima Indian children.
Sigal RJ, El-Hashimy M, Martin BC, Soeldner JS, Krolewski AS, Warram JH: Acute postchallenge hyperinsulinemia predicts weight gain: a prospective study. Yost TJ, Jensen DR, Eckel RH: Weight regain following sustained weight reduction is predicted by relative insulin sensitivity.
Obes Res. Halberg N, Henriksen M, Söderhamn N, Stallknecht B, Ploug T, Schjerling P, Dela F: Effect of intermittent fasting and refeeding on insulin action in healthy men. J Appl Physiol. Akram DS, Astrup AV, Atinmo T, Boisson JL, Bray GA, Carroll KK, Chunming C, Chitson P, Dietz WH, Hill JO, et al: Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic.
Report of a WHO consultation on obesity. Weinsier RL, Norris DJ, Birch R, Bernstein RS, Wang J, Yang MU, Pierson RN, Van Itallie TB: The relative contribution of body fat and fat pattern to blood pressure level.
Ernsberger P, Nelson DO: Effects of fasting and refeeding on blood pressure are determined by nutritional state, not by body weight change. Am J Hypertens.
Schulz M, Liese A, Boeing H, Cunningham J, Moore C, Kroke A: Associations of short-term weight changes and weight cycling with incidence of essential hypertension in the EPIC-Potsdam Study. J Hum Hypertens. Ernsberger P, Koletsky RJ, Baskin JZ, Collins LA: Consequences of weight cycling in obese spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Am J Physiol. Ernsberger P, Koletsky RJ, Baskin JZ, Foley M: Refeeding hypertension in obese spontaneously hypertensive rats. Chernin K: The Obsession: Reflections on the tyranny of slenderness.
Cambien F, Chretien J, Ducimetiere L, Guize L, Richard J: Is the relationship between blood pressure and cardiovascular risk dependent on body mass index?.
Weinsier R, James L, Darnell B, Dustan H, Birch R, Hunter G: Body fat: Its relationship to coronary heart disease, blood pressure, lipids, and other risk factors measured in a large male population.
Uretsky S, Messerli FH, Bangalore S, Champion A, Cooper-Dehoff RM, Zhou Q, Pepine CJ: Obesity paradox in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease. Messerli FH: Cardiovascular adaptations to obesity and arterial hypertension: detrimental or beneficial?.
Int J Cardiol. Gregg EW, Cheng YJ, Cadwell BL, Imperatore G, Williams DE, Flegal KM, Narayan KM, Williamson DF: Secular trends in cardiovascular disease risk factors according to body mass index in US adults. Williamson DF, Pamuk E, Thun M, Flanders D, Byers T, Heath C: Prospective study of intentional weight loss and mortality in never-smoking overweight U.
white women aged years. Williamson DF, Pamuk E, Thun M, Flanders D, Byers T, Heath C: Prospective study of intentional weight loss and mortality in overweight white men aged years. Andres R, Muller DC, Sorkin JD: Long-term effects of change in body weight on all-cause mortality.
A review. Yaari S, Goldbourt U: Voluntary and involuntary weight loss: associations with long term mortality in 9, middle-aged and elderly men. Sørensen T, Rissanen A, Korkeila M, Kaprio J: Intention to lose weight, weight changes, and y mortality in overweight individuals without co- morbidities.
Simonsen MK, Hundrup YA, Obel EB, Gronbaek M, Heitmann BL: Intentional weight loss and mortality among initially healthy men and women. Nutr Rev. Ingram DD, Mussolino ME: Weight loss from maximum body weight and mortality: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Linked Mortality File.
Klein S, Fontana L, Young VL, Coggan AR, Kilo C, Patterson BW, Mohammed BS: Absence of an effect of liposuction on insulin action and risk factors for coronary heart disease.
Manning RM, Jung RT, Leese GP, Newton RW: The comparison of four weight reduction strategies aimed at overweight patients with diabetes mellitus: four-year follow-up. Diabet Med. Wing RR, Anglin K: Effectiveness of a behavioral weight control program for blacks and whites with NIDDM.
Ciliska D, Kelly C, Petrov N, Chalmers J: A review of weight loss interventions for obese people with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Can J of Diabetes Care. Howard BV, Manson JE, Stefanick ML, Beresford SA, Frank G, Jones B, Rodabough RJ, Snetselaar L, Thomson C, Tinker L, et al: Low-fat dietary pattern and weight change over 7 years: the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial.
Howard BV, Van Horn L, Hsia J, Manson JE, Stefanick ML, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Kuller LH, LaCroix AZ, Langer RD, Lasser NL, et al: Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial.
Aphramor L: Is A Weight-Centred Health Framework Salutogenic? Some Thoughts on Unhinging Certain Dietary Ideologies.
Social Theory and Health. Aphramor L: Weight management as a cardioprotective intervention raises issues for nutritional scientists regarding clinical ethics. Proc Nut Soc. Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Dahlgren S, Larsson B, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, et al: Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery.
Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD: Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. Bacon L, Stern JS, Keim NL, Van Loan MD: Low bone mass in premenopausal chronic dieting obese women.
Eur J Clin Nutr. Van Loan MD, Keim NL: Influence of cognitive eating restraint on total-body measurements of bone mineral density and bone mineral content in premenopausal women y: a cross-sectional study.
Am J Clin Nutr. Van Loan MD, Bachrach LK, Wang MC, Crawford PB: Effect of drive for thinness during adolescence on adult bone mass. J Bone Miner Res. Barr SI, Prior JC, Vigna YM: Restrained eating and ovulatory disturbances: Possible implications for bone health.
Tomiyama AJ, Mann T, Vinas D, Hunger JM, Dejager J, Taylor SE: Low calorie dieting increases cortisol. Psychosom Med. CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Lee DH, Lee IK, Song K, Steffes M, Toscano W, Baker BA, Jacobs DR: A strong dose-response relation between serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and diabetes: results from the National Health and Examination Survey Carpenter DO: Environmental contaminants as risk factors for developing diabetes.
Rev Environ Health. Ha MH, Lee DH, Jacobs DR: Association between serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and self-reported cardiovascular disease prevalence: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Environ Health Perspect.
Lee DH, Steffes M, Jacobs DR: Positive associations of serum concentration of polychlorinated biphenyls or organochlorine pesticides with self-reported arthritis, especially rheumatoid type, in women.
Chevrier J, Dewailly E, Ayotte P, Mauriege P, Despres JP, Tremblay A: Body weight loss increases plasma and adipose tissue concentrations of potentially toxic pollutants in obese individuals.
Lim JS, Son HK, Park SK, Jacobs DR, Lee DH: Inverse associations between long-term weight change and serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants. Davison KK, Markey CN, Birch LL: A longitudinal examination of patterns in girls' weight concerns and body dissatisfaction from ages 5 to 9 years.
Holm S: Obesity interventions and ethics. Neumark-Sztainer D, Levine MP, Paxton SJ, Smolak L, Piran N, Wertheim EH: Prevention of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating: What next?. Eat Disord. van den Berg P, Neumark-Sztainer D: Fat 'n happy 5 years later: is it bad for overweight girls to like their bodies?.
Stice E, Cameron RP, Killen JD, Hayward C, Taylor CB: Naturalistic weight-reduction efforts prospectively predict growth in relative weight and onset of obesity among female adolescents. Coakley EH, Rimm EB, Colditz G, Kawachi I, Willett W: Predictors of weight change in men: Results from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study.
Bild DE, Sholinksy P, Smith DE, Lewis CE, Hardin JM, Burke GL: Correlates and predictors of weight loss in young adults: The CARDIA study.
Linda M. Delahanty; Evidence-Based Trends for Achieving Weight Approaxhes and Increased Physical Activity: Applications for Evidencd-based Prevention Natural metabolism boosters Evidence-based weight approaches. Diabetes Spectr Evidence-absed July ; Evidence-based weight approaches 3 : — The prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing dramatically and so is the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Evidence-based treatment recommendations for overweight and obesity have been published, and recent research has demonstrated that lifestyle interventions, primarily weight loss and increased activity, are very effective in preventing diabetes.
Ich denke, dass Sie den Fehler zulassen. Geben Sie wir werden besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden reden.
Ich denke, dass Sie sich irren. Es ich kann beweisen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.