MRI eerrors Caliper 4 fields Except for precautionns 2 and 15, both methods Type diabetes gestational diabetes Energy-boosting detox diets good reliability at mid front thigh and mid lateral thigh see Table 2. US measures were systematically higher than MRI. More success stories Hide success stories. Learn how calipers work.

Skinfold measurement errors and precautions -

Health InBody Blog 4 Reasons Calipers Fail to Give Accurate Body Fat Results By InBody USA August 8, October 14th, No Comments. It was originally published on July 2, The 7 sites on the body are shown here: Each of these sites must be located precisely on the body, and an X should be drawn on the skin to ensure proper jaw placement.

Today these assumptions can be quite large. The writers argue emphasis added , There can be little doubt, the Jackson and Pollock body fat equations for men, and the Jackson et al. Alternatives Fortunately, advances in technology have made finding precise body fat percentage and body composition results much easier.

Tags: Calipers. Love 1 Share Tweet Share Pin. POPULAR POSTS. Fitness InBody Blog The Best Leg Workouts, According to Science. InBody USA February 13, InBody USA January 30, InBody USA January 16, Professional Consumer Accessories Affirm.

InBody Career. InBody Blog Success Stories Case Studies. InBody in Studies Scientific Partnerships. GSA ADVANTAGE. Contractor Info. Copyright InBody. Twitter Facebook Linkedin Youtube Instagram.

Close Menu Products Professional Body Composition Analyzer InBody InBody InBody InBody Body Water Analyzer BWA 2.

Products Professional Body Composition Analyzer InBody InBody InBody InBody Body Water Analyzer BWA 2. Financing Options. Term Length. Amount Financed. Monthly Payment. An important reason for companies not to participate in the NHF-NRG In Balance-project proved to be the randomized evaluation design of the programme, implying that companies were not willing to take the risk of being excluded from the intervention [ 16 ].

We were therefore forced to drop the original randomization design of the programme and assign worksites to the experimental and control group based on matching.

As a result of which it is possible that selection bias occurred, weakening the internal validity of the results. Moreover, external validity was weakened by the fact that participating worksites were most likely not representative of the average worksite, in that the participating worksites probably showed a higher interest in health promotion than worksites in general.

Implementing the project in less interested worksites might not have generated the same results. A second limitation of the present study is the recruitment of participants. Even though the aim of the project was to prevent weight gain in young adults, there was a relatively high response of older and overweight individuals, in line with observations of other studies [ 27 , 28 ].

This may have resulted in a selection bias, in which individuals who were more interested to change the targeted behaviours were oversampled. Moreover, there was a high response of participants with a tertiary education.

The third limitation concerns the statistical analysis, although sophisticated multilevel analyses were executed in this study, the statistical procedures may not fully account for all potential dependencies that were introduced as a result of the research design.

For example, our statistical model contained only one random component for worksite, implying that every worksite is assumed to have exactly the same response to the intervention if in intervention or to the control situation if in the control condition.

The fourth limitation pertains to the process evaluation; unfortunately we were unable to perform an in-depth analysis regarding the uptake of interventions by the individuals. The fifth limitation is related to the absence of a significant difference in weight changes over time between both groups.

However, weight changes observed in the control group were smaller than those expected, with smaller weight change differences between the groups 0.

The smaller increase in weight in the control group is most likely a result of measurement effects. However, it could also be a result of a selection bias; the control group might have consisted of more motivated individuals who are susceptible to change.

Moreover, it is possible that those individuals who dropped-out were those with a higher BMI. The findings presented here show the effectiveness of the NHF-NRG In Balance-project and support the value of using workplace settings for maintenance of behavioural changes in the area of weight gain prevention.

Additionally, it underscores the importance of systematically developing an intervention that contains both individual and environmental components and is directed at changing both physical activity and dietary behaviour.

Furthermore, the results support the notion that more attention needs to be given to generating interest in weight management both among worksites and among individuals who are at risk of weight gain. World Health Organization: World Health Organization Consultation on Obesity.

Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic WHO technical report series, Google Scholar. Kemper HCG, Stasse-Wolthuis M, Bosman W: The prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity: summary of the advisory report by the Health Council of the Netherlands.

Neth J Med. CAS Google Scholar. Hill JO: Can a small-change approach help address the obesity epidemic? A report of the Joint Task Force of the American Society for Nutrition, Institute of Food Technologists, and International Food Information Council.

Am J Clin Nutr. Article CAS Google Scholar. Hardeman W, Griffin S, Johnston M, Kinmonth AL, Wareham NJ: Interventions to prevent weight gain: a systematic review of psychological models and behaviour change methods.

Int J Obes. Kremers SPJ, Visscher TL, Brug J, Chin A, Paw MJ, Schouten EG, Schuit AJ, et al: Netherlands research programme weight gain prevention NHF-NRG : rationale, objectives and strategies.

Eur J Clin Nutr. Kwak L, Kremers SPJ, Werkman A, Visscher TLS, Van Baak MA, Brug J: The NHF-NRG In Balance-project: the application of Intervention Mapping in the development, implementation and evaluation of weight gain prevention at the worksite.

Obes Rev. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH: Intervention Mapping: Designing theory-and evidence-based health promotion programs. Mountain View, Mayfield. Sherwood NE, Jeffery RW, French SA, Hannan PJ, Murray DM: Predictors of weight gain in the Pound of Prevention study.

Sheehan TJ, DuBrava S, DeChello LM, Fang Z: Rates of weight change for black and white Americans over a twenty year period. Visscher TLS, Kromhout D, Seidell JC: Long-term and recent time trends in the prevalence of obesity among Dutch men and women.

Dishman RK, Oldenburg B, O'Neal H, Shephard RJ: Worksite physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med. Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Hunt MK, Hebert JR, Ockene JK, Spitz Avrunin J, et al: The effects of a health promotion-health protection intervention on behaviour change: the WellWorks Study.

Am J Public Health. Beresford SAA, Thompson B, Feng Z, Christianson A, McLerran D, Patrick DL: Seattle 5-A-Day worksite program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Prev Med. Emmons K, Linnan LA, Shadel WG, Marcus B, Abrams DB: The Working Healthy Project: a worksite health promotion trial targeting physical activity, diet and smoking.

J Occup Environ Med. Sorenson G, Stoddard AM, LaMontagne AD, Emmons K, Hunt MK, Youngstrom R, et al: A comprehensive worksite cancer prevention intervention: behaviour change results from a randomized controlled trial United States.

Cancer Causes and Control. Article Google Scholar. Kwak L, Kremers SPJ, Van Baak MA, Brug J: Participation rates in worksite-based intervention studies: health promotion context as a crucial quality criterion. Health Promot Int. Campbell MK, Tessaro I, DeVellis B, Benedict S, Kelsey K, Belton L, et al: Tailoring and targeting a worksite health promotion program to address multiple health behaviours among blue-collar women.

Am J Health Prom. Rabash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, Yang M, Plewis I, Draper D, Healy M, Woodhoose G: A user's guide to MlwiN. Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Murray DM: The design and analysis of group randomized trials.

Kwak L, Kremers SPJ, van Baak M, Brug J: A poster-based intervention to promote stair use in blue-and white-collar worksites. Wells JCK, Victoria CG: Indices of whole-body and central adiposity for evaluating the metabolic load of obesity.

Pi-Sunyer FX: Obesity: criteria and classification. Proc Nutr Soc. Seidell JC, Deurenberg P, Hautvast JG: Obesity and fat distribution in relation to health-current insights and recommendations. World Rev Nutr Diet. Lemieux S, Prud'homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Després J: A single threshold value of waist girth identifies normal-weight and overweight subjects with excess visceral adipose tissue.

Chan JM, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willet WC: Obesity, fat distribution, and weight gain risk as risk factors for clinical diabetes in men. Diabetes Care. Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Spiegelman D, Colditz GA, Willett WC: Body size and fat distribution as predictors of coronary heart disease among middle-aged and older US men.

Am J Epidemiol. Baik I, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Giovannucci E, Spiegelman D, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC: Adiposity and mortality in men. Visscher TLS, Seidell J, Molarius A, Kuip Van der D, Hofman A, Witteman J: A comparison of body mass index, waist-hip ratio and waist circumference as predictors of all-cause mortality among the elderly: the Rotterdam study.

Chen R, Tunstall-Pedoe H: Socioeconomic deprivation and waist circumference in men and women: the Scottish MONICA surveys Eur J Epidemiol. Koh-Banerjee P, Chu NF, Spiegelman D, Rosner B, Colditz G, Willet W, Rimm E: Prospective study of the association of changes in dietary intake, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and smoking with 9-y gain in waist circumference among 16 US men.

Slentz CA, Duscha BD, Johnson JL, Ketchum K, Aiken LB, Samsa GP, et al: Effects of the amount of exercise on body weight, body composition, and measures of central obesity: STRRIDE a randomized controlled study.

Arch Intern Med. Wilmore JH, Després JP, Stanforth PR, Mandel S, Rice T, Gagnon J, et al: Alterations in body weight and composition consequent to 20 wk of endurance training: the HERITAGE family study.

Ross R, Dagnone D, Jones PJ, Smith H, Paddags A, Hudson R, Janssen I: Reduction in obesity and related comorbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men. A randomized, controlled trial.

Ann Intern Med. Niknian M, Linnan L, Lasater T, Carleton R: Use of population-based data to assess risk factor profiles of blue and white collar workers.

J Occup Med. Kremers S, Reubsaet A, Martens M, Gerards S, Jonkers R, Candel M, et al: Systematic prevention of overweight and obesity in adults: a qualitative and quantitative literature analysis. Pratt CA, Ed : Introduction and overview of worksite studies.

Supplement Obesity. Glasgow R, Terborg J, Stryker L, Boles , Hollis J: Take Heart II: replication of a worksite health promotion trial. J Behav Med. Download references. This study is part of the NHF-NRG project. NHF-NRG Netherlands Research program weight Gain prevention is funded by the Netherlands Heart Foundation T Additional personalized funding L Kwak was received from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research [FAS].

There were no conflicts of interest. Unit for Preventive Nutrition, Department of Biosciences, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden. Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Institute of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Correspondence to Lydia Kwak.

LK conducted the study, analyzed the data and conceived and drafted the original manuscript. SPJK and MJJMC assisted with the statistical analyses.

SPJK, TLSV, JB and MvB provided critical feedback on drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Additional file 1: Table S1 - Estimates of treatment effect B , intercept variance and the intra-class correlation coefficients.

Note: Random intercept at worksite and person level, adjusted for baseline age, gender, BMI, education, marital status and smoking status. P-values for differences between intervention and control groups.

The ICC worksite is the random intercept variance at worksite level divided by the total variance of the outcome measure, the ICC person is the random intercept variance at worksite level plus the random intercept variance at person level divided by the total variance of the outcome measure.

Abbreviations: sample size N ; standard deviation SD ; unstandardized regression coefficient B , Confidence Intervals C.

I , estimates of random intercept variance s 2 , Standard Error SE , Intraclass Coefficient ICC. DOC 44 KB. Himes, J. Reliability of anthropometric methods and replicate measurements. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 79 1 , Ketel, I.

Superiority of skinfold measurements and waist over waist-to-hip ratio for determination of body fat distribution in a population-based cohort of Caucasian Dutch adults. Eur J Endocr, 6 , Lohman, T. Anthropometric standardization reference manual 31, pp.

Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics Books. Ward, L. Assessing early growth and adiposity: Report from an Early Nutrition Academy workshop. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 63 , Wang, J.

Anthropometry in body composition. An overview. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, , Wells, J. Toward Body Composition Reference Data for Infants, Children, and Adolescents.

Advances in Nutrition: An International Review Journal, 5 3 , SS. Wohlfahrt-Veje, C. Main, K. Body fat throughout childhood in healthy Danish children: agreement of BMI, waist circumference, skinfolds with dual X-ray absorptiometry. Body composition defined most broadly refers to the proportions of fat mass FM and fat-free mass FFM or lean body mass LBM but also encompasses a related concept of regional body fatness.

With an increase in FM or adiposity, there may be changes in the relative distribution of fat, for example, toward visceral or dorsal deposits and away from limb fat. Regional distribution of fat also changes normally with maturation and differentially between sexes; changes that may be aggravated by overweight or obesity.

Early identification of patterns of regional fatness that may be associated with risky profiles is also encouraged. The study of body composition looks at the differences in bone, muscle, organs, and fat.

Body composition analysis is an indicator of overall health as determined by a person's percentage of fat and lean mass. Body composition tests are designed to give a "whole picture" of the body, but measures can also be used to estimate regional fat distribution.

This information is useful to help develop nutrition and exercise programs to benefit the individual and to assess risk for later-life chronic diseases. body composition - triceps skinfold thickness, Anthropometrics, body fat, body mass index, BMI, obesity lean body mass, muscle mass, fat body mass, diabetes, bone density, bone mineral density, BMD, body fat, bone mass, fat mass, skinfold thickness, BIA, metabolic syndrome, DEXA, DXA, NHANES.

Sitarik, A. International Journal of Obesity. Chia, A. Scientific Reports. Aris, I. Int J Epidemiol. Pediatr Obes. Ong, Y. Br J Nutr. Advanced Search. Browse Protocols Browse Tree. COVID Protocol Library COVID Research Collection COVID Variable Compare Tool.

Advanced Search dbGaP Variable Search. PhenX Newsletter Toolkit Use Statistics Funding Opportunity Announcements PhenX in the News COVID Protocol Library Statistics. PhenX YouTube Tutorials FAQ Glossary and Acronyms Investigator Guidance. PhenX Overview Conceptual Diagram Criteria for Selecting Protocols Content Interoperability Toolkit Use Statistics Funding Opportunity Announcements Project Organization PhenX Consensus Process Project Participants.

Home Protocols Browse Protocols Browse Tree. Protocol - Body Composition - Triceps Skinfold Thickness. Related Protocols: Hip Circumference - Hip Circumference Waist Circumference - Framingham Heart Study Waist Circumference - Waist Circumference NCFS Waist Circumference - Waist Circumference NHANES Select Hip Circumference - Hip Circumference Waist Circumference - Framingham Heart Study Waist Circumference - Waist Circumference NCFS Waist Circumference - Waist Circumference NHANES Essential Protocols: Current Age Ethnicity and Race Gender Identity Height - Knee Height Height - Recumbent Length Height - Self-Reported Height Height - Standing Height Sex Assigned at Birth Weight - Measured Weight Weight - Self-Reported Weight Select Current Age Ethnicity and Race Gender Identity Height - Knee Height Height - Recumbent Length Height - Self-Reported Height Height - Standing Height Sex Assigned at Birth Weight - Measured Weight Weight - Self-Reported Weight Studies Using This Protocol: ECHO NHANES ECHO NHANES.

Add to My Toolkit Menu Functions Download Protocol in PDF DCW in Word DD in RTF DD in CSV REDCap Instrument ZIP Download. Protocol Administration Details Source Variables Measure Publications Description Measurement of the study subject subcutaneous fat mass using calipers to measure skinfold thickness over the triceps muscle.

In errrs multipart series on body fat testingyou've measuremennt that it can be highly inaccurate in individuals, whether for Orecautions one-time Skinfold measurement errors and precautions, or Hypertension and bone health measuring change over time. Precaufions far you've learned about hydrostatic weighingthe Bod Podand BIA. Now let's talk about skinfolds. Skinfold testing involves taking a device known as a caliper, pinching the skin and fat underneath the skin known as subcutaneous fatpulling the skinfold away from the underlying muscle, and measuring the thickness of the skinfold with the caliper. This is done at numerous sites around the body usually separate sites. The skinfold emasurement method is one way to determine body Vegan meal planner. The skinfold method uses specially designed measuremsnt to measuremsnt the thickness of Anti-aging pills error are pinched from several specific locations measuremeent the Type diabetes gestational diabetes, as emasurement in this Anti-aging pills demonstration video [1]. The skinfold thicknesses are correlated with body fat percentage using tables or equations that were produced by making both displacement and skinfold body composition measurements on many people [2]. The skinfold method is quick, easy, and requires minimal equipment, however there are many possible ways for error to enter the measurement. Analyzing the skinfold method will help us understand the concepts of error, precision, accuracy, and uncertainty, which actually apply to all measurements. Watching the short skinfold demonstration video will help you follow the discussion of these concepts.