Similar to hydrostatic weighing, air displacement plethysmography ADP estimates your body fat percentage based on the density of your body 9. However, ADP uses air instead of water.

The relationship between the volume and pressure of air allows this device to predict the density of your body You sit inside an egg-shaped chamber for several minutes while the pressure of the air inside the chamber is altered.

To obtain accurate measurements, you need to wear skin-tight clothing or a bathing suit during testing. The Bod Pod is the main ADP device currently used. It predicts your body fat with air rather than water.

BIA devices detect how your body responds to small electrical currents. This is done by placing electrodes on your skin. Some electrodes send currents into your body, while others receive the signal after it has passed through your body tissues.

Electrical currents move through muscle easier than fat due to the higher water content of muscle BIA devices work by sending small electrical currents through your body to see how easily they travel through your tissues.

Many different devices are available, although advanced devices produce more accurate results. BIS and BIA devices look similar but use different technology. BIS uses a much larger number of electrical currents than BIA, in addition to high and low frequencies, to mathematically predict your amount of body fluid BIS also analyzes the information differently, and some researchers believe that BIS is more accurate than BIA 14 , However, similar to BIA, BIS uses the body fluid information it gathers to predict your body composition based on equations The accuracy of both of these methods depends on how similar you are to the people for whom these equations were developed However, BIS uses more electrical currents and processes the information differently.

However, while BIA and BIS send currents through your whole body, EIM sends currents through smaller regions of your body These devices are placed on different parts of the body to estimate the body fat of those specific areas Because this device is placed directly on specific body regions, it has some similarities to skinfold calipers, although the technologies are very different.

EIM injects electrical currents into small body regions. Portable devices are placed directly on different body parts to estimate the body fat percentage at those locations. More research is needed to establish the accuracy of this method.

For some devices, you stand on a rotating platform for several minutes while the sensors detect your body shape. Other devices use sensors that rotate around your body. In this way, 3-D body scanners are similar to circumference measurements.

However, a greater amount of information is provided by a 3-D scanner The method uses information about your body shape to predict your body fat percentage. More information is needed about the accuracy of these methods.

Multi-compartment models are considered to be the most accurate method of body composition assessment 3 , These models split the body into three or more parts. The most common assessments are called 3-compartment and 4-compartment models. These models require multiple tests to get estimates of body mass, body volume, body water and bone content For example, hydrostatic weighing or ADP can provide body volume, BIS or BIA can provide body water and DXA can measure bone content.

Information from each of these methods is combined to build a more complete picture of the body and obtain the most accurate body fat percentage 21 , However, they involve multiple tests and are not typically available to the general public. Some methods, such as skinfold measurements, circumference calculations and portable BIA devices, are inexpensive and allow you to be measured in your own home as frequently as you like.

The devices can also be purchased online easily, such as on Amazon. Most of the methods with highest accuracies are not available to use in your own home.

If you want a more accurate assessment and are willing to pay for it, you could pursue a method with good accuracy like hydrostatic weighing, ADP or DXA. Ideally, you should do the test before you have anything to drink, especially for methods that rely on electrical signals like BIA, BIS and EIM.

Assessing yourself the same way each time will reduce error rates and make it easier to tell if you are making progress. However, you should always interpret your results from any method with caution.

Even the best methods are not perfect and only give you an estimate of your true body fat. Our experts continually monitor the health and wellness space, and we update our articles when new information becomes available.

Several dietary and lifestyle changes can help you burn body fat. Here are 12 great methods to promote long-term fat loss. It is a myth that a pound of body fat contains exactly 3, calories. This article explains the actual amount and what that means for weight loss.

This article takes a look at the science behind targeted fat loss, and checks if you can slim down specific areas of your body. If losing weight is your goal, this article covers 18 foods that may help support a healthy and sustainable weight loss journey, according to science.

Making a few small changes to your morning routine can help you lose weight and keep it off. This article tells you how.

Exercise burns calories, but many people claim it doesn't help you lose weight. This article explores whether exercise really helps with weight loss.

Male body types are often divided into three types, determined by factors like limb proportions, weight, height, and body fat distribution. You can easily estimate your basal metabolic rate using the Mifflin-St.

Jeor equation — or by using our quick calculator. Here's how. Many think the pear body shape is healthier than the apple body shape. At one time, hydrostatic weighing also and maybe more accurately called hydrodensitometry was considered the criterion for measuring body composition.

Many other methods are founded on this model, in one form or another. The mass and volume components are measured by using dry weight and then weight while being submerged in a water tank. Since fat is less dense than muscle tissue, a person with more body fat will weigh less in the water than a similar person with more lean mass.

Using the measurements, the density can be determined and converted into body fat percentage. Unfortunately, the expense and practicality of building and maintaining a water tank limits access for most.

Also, for those with a fear of water, this would obviously not be the preferred method. While underwater weighing accurately compartmentalizes FM and FFM, DEXA adds a third compartment by using low-radiation X-rays to distinguish bone mineral.

This addition slightly increases the accuracy of DEXA by eliminating some of the guess work associated with individual differences, such as total body water and bone mineral density.

Originally, DEXA scanners were designed to determine and help diagnose bone density diseases. However, a full body scan, which takes only a few minutes, is all that is needed to also determine body fat percentage.

Major disadvantages to this method are its high cost and the need for a well-trained professional to operate the equipment and analyze the results.

A good alternative to more expensive methods, air displacement determines body density using the same principle as underwater weighing, by measuring mass and volume. Clearly, the main difference is that mass and volume are being determined by air displacement rather than water displacement.

Using a commercial device the Bod Pod is most commonly referenced , a person sits in a chamber that varies the air pressure allowing for body volume to be assessed.

Air displacement provides a viable alternative for those with a fear of water. Like many other methods, the expense, availability, and training of personnel Air Displacement requires limit accessibility. Additionally, its accuracy is slightly less than underwater weighing.

BIA takes a slightly different approach to measuring FFM. The premise behind BIA is that FFM will be proportional to the electrical conductivity of the body. Fat-tissue contains little water, making it a poor conductor of electricity; whereas, lean tissue contains mostly water and electrolytes, making it an excellent conductor.

BIA devices emit a low-level electrical current through the body and measure the amount of resistance the current encounters.

Based on the level of impedance, a pre-programed equation is used to estimate body fat percentage. The most accurate BIA devices use electrodes on the feet and hands to administer the point-to-point electrical current.

Because BIA devices primarily measure hydration, circumstances that may influence hydration status at the time of measurement must be taken into account.

Some, such as Body Fat Test , provide a mobile hydrostatic body composition testing service. The lack of easy access to this testing makes is less than ideal to use, especially since other methods of measurement are widely available. Hydrostatic weighing is considered to be accurate, but there are other technologies being developed that may replace it.

One is the Bod Pod, which uses air displacement in much the same way hydrostatic weighing uses water displacement. Another is dual energy X-ray absorptiometry DEXA , which measures bone mineral content as well as estimating body fat and muscle.

Bioelectric impedance body fat monitors are widely available for home use and at health clubs. They use a low voltage electric current to assess body composition.

However, these monitors are less accurate than hydrostatic weighing and dependent on several variables. Using fat calipers is another accessible, easy method.

Kirkendall DT, Grogan JW, Bowers RG. Field comparison of body composition techniques: Hydrostatic weighing, skinfold thickness, and bioelectric impedance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.

Lee SY, Gallagher D. Assessment methods in human body composition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. Lee DH, Keum N, Hu FB, et al.

Development and validation of anthropometric prediction equations for lean body mass, fat mass and percent fat in adults using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey NHANES Br J Nutr. Duren DL, Sherwood RJ, Czerwinski SA, et al.

Body composition methods: Comparisons and interpretation. J Diabetes Sci Technol. Rothney MP, Brychta RJ, Schaefer EV, Chen KY, Skarulis MC. Body composition measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry half-body scans in obese adults.

Obesity Silver Spring. By Elizabeth Quinn, MS Elizabeth Quinn is an exercise physiologist, sports medicine writer, and fitness consultant for corporate wellness and rehabilitation clinics.

Use limited data to select advertising. Create profiles for personalised advertising. Use profiles to select personalised advertising. Create profiles to personalise content.

Use profiles to select personalised content. Measure advertising performance. Measure content performance. Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources.

Develop and improve services. Use limited data to select content. List of Partners vendors. Health and Safety. By Elizabeth Quinn, MS Elizabeth Quinn, MS. The most commonly used equations for estimating the percent of body fat from density are as follows:.

Considerations relating to the use of hydrostatic underwater weighing for anthropometry in specific populations are described in Table 2. Refer to section: practical considerations for objective anthropometry. About About the DAPA Measurement Toolkit What's New Other resources Toolkit Team Contact.

Introduction Validity Reliability Error and bias Feasibility Data processing Statistical assessment of reliability and validity Harmonisation. Introduction Subjective methods Objective methods Harmonisation Videos Dietary assessment decision matrix.

Introduction Subjective methods Objective methods Harmonisation Videos Physical activity assessment decision matrix. Introduction Subjective methods Objective methods Anthropometric indices Harmonisation Videos Anthropometry decision matrix.

Anthropometry Domain. Hydrostatic underwater weighing. What is assessed? How is the measurement conducted? When is this method used? How are estimates of body composition derived?

Strengths and limitations Populations Further considerations Resources required Instrument library References. Two methods to determine total body water An allowance must be made for residual lung volume the air that remains in the lungs after a maximal exhalation as this air increases the participant's buoyancy.

Dry bodyweight After having measured or estimated residual lung volume, the participant's dry weight is measured wearing a swimming suit or running shorts. Underwater weight The participant climbs into the underwater weighing tank and sits in a seat that hangs from a force load-cell.

After the underwater weight stabilizes approximately 5 seconds , the participant is instructed, though yelling or pounding on the side of the tank, to return to an upright position. During weighing, the participant is always free to stand up or return to the upright position.

Several trials may be required before the participant becomes accustomed to the procedure and consistent readings recorded. Four to eight trials are usually performed. The depth of the water is approximately cm, and temperature maintained between 30 and 34 C. The density of water is dependent on the temperature and should always be factored into the equation.

After each testing session, the water is drained and the tank allowed to dry. Pre-test Guidelines Participants must not eat or engage in strenuous exercise for at least 4 hours before their scheduled appointment.

Body density is required to calculate percentage body fat. Strengths and limitations. An overview of the characteristics of hydrostatic underwater weighing is outlined in Table 1. elderly Participant must be able to perform complete air exhalation There is a possibility of considerable error introduced by the miscalculation of residual volume RV The test does not identify the exact parts of the body where the fat is located e.

unable to assess fat distribution The accuracy of body density measurements can be affected by the consumption of food and carbonated beverages shortly before the test, fluid loss during intensive exercise, fluid retention during menstruation, and the degree of forcible exhalation while submerged Like all the 2 component model methods, it assumes when calculating total body density that the relative amounts and densities of bone, muscle, and water comprising the fat-free mass are essentially the same for all individuals, regardless of age, sex, ethnicity or fitness level Table 1 Characteristics of hydrostatic underwater weighing.

Consideration Comment Number of participants Small Relative cost Medium Participant burden High Researcher burden of data collection High Researcher burden of coding and data analysis Low Risk of reactivity bias No Risk of recall bias No Risk of social desirability bias No Risk of observer bias No Space required High Availability Medium Suitability for field use No Participant literacy required No Cognitively demanding No.

Table 2 Anthrompometry by hydrostatic underwater weighing in different populations. Population Comment Pregnancy Suitable but unable to disentangle the mother-fetal unit Infancy and lactation Not suitable Toddlers and young children Not suitable Adolescents Not suitable Older adults May not be suitable as older individuals have less dense bones, resulting in over-estimation of body fat Ethnic groups Suitable Other athletes Athletes tend to have denser bone and muscle tissue, resulting in under-estimation of body fat Other obesity Suitable.

Further considerations. Resources required. Hydrostatic stainless steel weighing tank Underwater mounted chair and scale Weighted belt and nose clip A simpler set up may include a chair and scale suspended from a diving board over a pool Trained research staff.

Instrument library.

A DEXA scan can also measure visceral fat, or the fat around the internal organs. This is particularly important in assessing risk of chronic disease such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer. Access to this type of information brings even more value to a DEXA scan than just body fat and lean mass measurements — it can be the difference in whether or not to intervene with potentially lifesaving lifestyle behavior changes.

The hydrostatic weighing method comes with a few inconvenient steps — removal of clothing, expelling all air and holding the breath, and complete underwater submergence. During a DEXA scan, any type of clothing can we worn and the subject lays comfortably on a flat-bed device for under 10 minutes.

A full report is generated moments later, without the need for extra calculations that may be impacted by human error. Hydrostatic weighing uses physics-based approach to body composition testing that, while seeped in history and tradition, may lead to less accurate results when compared to imaging-based tests like a DEXA scan.

A DEXA scan also offers more information on bone density, visceral fat and regional body analysis that hydrostatic testing does not provide. To learn more about your own body composition and overall health, schedule a DEXA scan and talk to a Nutrition Coach at a Composition ID location near you. Subscribe Today!

As we usher in , many of us set our sights on self-improvement, with one of the most common resolutions being to prioritize health and fitness. However, more often than not, lofty goals are set aside by the time February hits. Why do health plans fall off? Embarking on a journey towards improved health and fitness requires dedication, perseverance, and the willingness to step outside of your comfort zone.

Among the many motivational tools available, fitness challenges have gained popularity for their ability to push Does it feel rare to have a day when your energy feels high and stays high? An afternoon slump is a common phenomenon that most adults experience, especially with age.

While that second or third cup of coffee is typically the answer for most, there are ways to prevent Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow DEXA Scan vs.

Hydrostatic Weighing for Body Fat Analysis. Shannon Miller. April 25, What is Hydrostatic Weighing? Source: Encyclopedia Britannica. Sign Up For Our Newsletter for Insights and Discounts Today!

Name Email Subscribe Today! Article Sources. Tools Tools. What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Get shortened URL Download QR code Wikidata item. Download as PDF Printable version. In other projects.

Wikimedia Commons. Technique for measuring the density of a living person's body. JAMA reprinted in Obesity Research. doi : Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition, and Human Performance 7th Edition. ISBN Bulletin Européen de Physiopathologie Respiratoire.

European Community for Coal and Steel, Luxembourg. H Quanjer; G. Tammeling; J. Cotes; O. Pedersen; R. Peslin; J-C. Yernault European Respiratory Journal.